Deforsac – Personal Injury Attorney

The Federal ban on sports betting has been blasted by anyone who knows anything about the subject for a number of different reasons. Though the US professional leagues suggest that sports betting threatens the integrity of their games, the opposite is the case. The professional bookmaking industry is usually where any type of compromised or fixed game is discovered. Ultimately, the best case for legal sports betting is Constitutional.
The Congress of the United States has shown very little respect for the Constitution in recent years. Were it to abide strictly by the role outlined for it by the founding fathers, the Legislative Branch of our government would have to relinquish any number of its powers in a variety of areas. The primary problem with our Congress is that it has increasingly become a collection of career politicians rather than a body representative of its constituency. Every increase in power at the Federal level must be brought about by a usurpation of state and local sovereignty and, more alarmingly, personal liberty.
The Federal prohibition of sports wagering which was enacted a few years back is of very dubious Constitutionality. Were it not for the grandfather clause, which allowed it to remain legal in jurisdictions in which it already existed, it would have certainly been struck down as unconstitutional on a number of different fronts.
Unfortunately, the mere fact that a proposed law or initiative is unconstitutional offers little protection for the citizenry. In fact, the concept of state sovereignty is one of the most important–and most abused–in the Constitution:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The overriding concern of the writers and framers of the Constitution was that the personal liberty of the individual not be violated by a too-powerful central government. In other words, unless the power in question has been expressly given to the Federal government by the Constitution, and/or unless it has expressly been prohibited to the states (as in the case of treaty making) it is the right of each individual state to govern themselves as they see fit. If an individual state chooses not to regulate a certain activity, it is the right of each individual citizen to make their own decision.
So, you should be asking yourself at this point, where exactly does the Constitution delegate to the Federal government the right to make policy on sports gambling? The answer is that it doesnt, and it is very questionable that they have the Constitutional authority to do so. Fortunately for all freedom loving Americans the founding fathers would beg to differ.
The entire premise of a social contract between a government and the governed is that individuals give up a certain degree of personal liberty for a certain degree of protection. The problem is that too many Americans are willing to give up just about any freedom for even the illusory promise of protection. If theyre not personally willing to cede this freedom, theyre often indifferent or unconcerned about it. The danger to broader concepts of personal liberty may seem a million miles away, but with each additional law intended to protect us from this or that the Federal government becomes larger and more powerful and the rights of the sovereign states”and the individuals that comprise them”are shrinking and being weakened.
Ross Everett is a respected freelance writer who covers travel, casino gambling and sports handicapping. He is a staff handicapper for Anatta Sports where he is responsible for providing daily free sports picks. In his spare time he enjoys fine dining, flower arranging and scuba diving. He lives in Southern Nevada with four dogs and a pet coyote.

View full post on CryoGenesis – Slip and Fall Attorney

We don’t often think about the real effect of the law in our everyday activities, even though we have a general understanding of what the law is and why we need it to regulate people’s conduct and keep us from being overrun by lawbreakers. But to the average person, what is law? What is the effect of law on our daily lives? Is the law only something that’s of importance to those who want to break the law? I will explain in this article some of the ways laws affect us every day in basic ways, and also the essence of the law. Many individuals only think of the law as being there to protect them and their interests from criminals, and never think of the way it affects their daily lives. They simply believe that the law will function to judge and sentence those who break the law, and that the will of the people, as expressed in the laws, will be carried out. This is a very simplistic view of the nature and function of law and how it affects us every day. If we think a little deeper, we realize that the Constitution sets the boundaries within which the government must operate when it makes laws to control the inhabitants of our country. Going deeper yet, we see that this affects the workings of the government and, through its laws, the way the country itself is run, which does have an effect on what we do and how we do it every day. Going down to the local level, the laws affect businesses and services that we use, so that our jobs and just about everything else in our lives is affected in some way. So is the law just some faraway force that operates only when someone breaks it? Not at all. Nor is the law a distant power limited to courts and constitutional questions. Rather, the law has a wide range of operation that reaches into society and legislates its organization and its daily functioning, so it regulates not only criminal activity, but also each person’s business situations and personal conduct. Want to find out more about cast bronze plaques , company, choose the best bronze plaque for your needs.

Follow this link:
How Does the Law Actually Affect Your Life?